I think there is a phenomena in romantic fiction where sexual assault and rape equal an immediate and easy plot device.
Unfortunately, I can't say I'm innocent of this. While reviewing and editing Lotus Petals,
I realized I, too, had included a scene implying intended forcible
rape. As I analyzed why I had written this scene, I determined it existed solely to allow the romantic hero to ride in, save the day, and be
rewarded for her good timing. This, at least in my mind, is not the right motivation for including rape, implied rape, or abuse in a romance. The scene was edited before the final book was published, and I found myself much more satisfied with the results. I just can't get behind the use of sexual assault for convenient plot twists--even when I do it myself.